$12.00 PHI 103 WEK 2 QUESTIONS Informal Logic
Found in Philosophy: General-PhilosophyChapter 1, # 0
PHI 103 WEEK 2 QUESTIONS. There are multiple versions. Ensure the questions below apply to yours. Use as quiz prep.
Solution clearly shows answer and the chapter it can be found in.
1. Question : Assume you are given a sound argument. What do you know about it?
It is deductive.
It is valid.
Both A and B
None of the above
2. Question : Human reasoning tends to use a mixture of both
oil and vinegar.
induction and deduction.
induction and reduction.
reduction and deduction.
3. Question : Deductive arguments should never be characterized as
true.
inferences.
valid.
sound.
4. Question : "All dogs hate cats. Sirius is a dog. So Sirius hates cats" is an example of a
sound inductive argument.
valid deductive argument.
invalid inductive argument.
weak deductive argument.
5. Question : The premises of an argument are
valid.
inferences.
not valid.
true or false.
6. Question : To criticize a deductive argument logically, one might
hit the person making the argument.
show one of the premises is false.
show one of the premises is true.
show the conclusion follows validly from the premises.
7. Question : In logic, arguments are never described as
true.
valid.
inductive.
sound.
8. Question : Inductive arguments should never be characterized as
weak.
very weak.
valid.
strong.
9. Question : A valid argument is one that, if its premises are accepted as true, has
a false conclusion.
a vague conclusion.
a pointless conclusion.
a true conclusion.
10. Question : One way to make an inductive argument stronger is to
make the conclusion weaker.
eliminate the conclusion.
state the argument in a louder voice.
pretend your argument is a good one.
- This tutorial was purchased 12 times and rated No Rating by students like you.
- Posted on Oct. 13, 2011 at 11:49:06AM
