$70.00 Critical thinking Argumentive paper
- From Philosophy: Formal-Logic , Literary-Studies: General-Literary-Studies
- Closed, but you can still post tutorials
- Due on Oct. 31, 2010
- Asked on Oct 04, 2010 at 2:19:13PM
This paper must be original
Argumentative Paper
An Argumentative Paper is due in Week Five. Below is a list of potential topics. Please see “Graded Writing Assignment Notices” in your Discussion Forum.
This set of topics and the topics on the grading forum have all been tested over time and can be successfully argued from different perspectives. Thus you need to choose a topic where you can see at least two points of view and present both points. You will have your own opinion and need to present that in Part III of your argument. If you feel so strongly about a topic that you cannot see another point of view, avoid writing about it.
Suggested Topics
-
- Should abortions be legal?
- Are Affirmative Action laws fair?
- Should America have stronger Gun Control laws?
- Should assisted suicide be legal?
- Are charter schools/vouchers detrimental to the American educational system?
- Should the death penalty be abolished?
- Should homosexuals be allowed to legally marry?
- Should homosexuals be allowed to be Christian ministers/pastors?
- Should animals be used in medical research?
- Is global warming a genuine threat to the planet earth?
- Should human cloning be legal?
- Should embryonic stem cell research be federally funded?
Select one of the above issues and construct a six-to eight-page argument in which you use the following format. Your paper will have three parts: Thesis, Anti-thesis, and Synthesis.
- Mark each section clearly with a section header.
- The sources used in the two sections may overlap and need not be completely different.
- No orphan sources: if a source is in the reference list, it must be quoted in the text, either a direct quote or paraphrased; if a source is quoted in the text, it must be in the reference list.
- Popular websites such as Wikipedia are not considered suitable as academic sources.
- You are to use the Ashford online library databases for your academic resources.
- If you do want to use articles from the Web, start with Google Scholar.
Part I: Thesis
Part I is your thesis. Write a short essay (two-to three- pages) taking one side or the other on the issue you select. You want to state very clearly the reasons you are taking the position you take, but you don’t have to defend it thoroughly (that’s what Part III is for).
Part II: Anti-thesis
Part II is the anti-thesis. Write a critical analysis in reply (two-to three- pages) to your essay in Part I by imagining that you oppose what the writer of Part I has stated. Careful reasoning is required. YOU MUST USE AT LEAST 3-5 academic/scholarly sources in the formation of this section. Remember that you are playing the “devil’s advocate,” but what every student must realize is that a sound critical thinker can argue any side of an argument because he/she is diligent and flexible in his/her thinking.
Part III: Synthesis
Part III is the synthesis (about two pages). Revisit Part I and, taking into account all the criticisms of Part II, write a thorough defense of your position. Again, like Part II, you must use at least 3-5 academic/scholarly sources in the formation of this section.
Writing the Argumentative Paper
The Argumentative Paper:
-
- Must be six-to eight-double-spaced pages in length and formatted according to APA style as outlined in the approved style guide.
- Must include a title page (in addition to the six-to eight- content pages) that includes the following in sequence:
- Title of paper
- Student’s name
- Course name
- Instructor’s name
- Date submitted
- Must include an introductory paragraph with a succinct thesis statement.
- Must address the topic of the paper with critical thought.
- Must conclude with a restatement of the thesis and a conclusion paragraph.
- Must use APA style as outlined in the approved APA style guide to document all sources.
- Must include a Reference page (in addition to the six-to eight-content pages) that is completed according to APA style as outlined in the approved style guide.
- This tutorial hasn't been purchased yet.
- Posted on Oct 04, 2010 at 3:26:23PM

Attachments:
[
CRT205 proof of grades.doc
discussion questions week 2468.doc
final apendix e rough draft.doc
Final Apendix E.doc
week1 taking a position.doc
week2 supporting position.doc
week3 part 1 argument crdibility.doc
week3 part 2 argument credibility.doc
week3 response to checkpoint2.doc
week5 analyzing credibilty.doc
week5 identifying fallcies.doc
week5apendix c catagorizing fallacies.doc
week7 argument validy.doc
week8 argument evaluation.doc
week9Capstone Check Point.doc
]
- This tutorial was purchased 1 time and rated No Rating by students like you.
- Posted on Oct. 23, 2010 at 04:22:48AM

Attachments:
